The central theme of the story asks
us to take matters in your own hand. Not to depend on others. This is summed up
well at the end of the movie. When asked how he feels about finally walking down
the road through the Mountain, he replies “Don’t depend on god. Who knows, god
might be depending on you”.
The movie shows people
celebrating the abolition of untouchability, around 8 years after independence.
I think the Director wished to draw attention to the fact that 68 years after
independence, some of our villages still struggle for water and electricity. Untouchability
isn’t an issue in the movie. It is used as a metaphor to talk about the current
environment.
Manjhi’s quest to make a road for
his villagers and believing in his task irrespective of people calling him fool
and an idiot shows the focus we need to have towards work. There will always be
naysayers. Single-minded approach always bears fruit. More important is the
process rather than the end result. Because process makes fundamental changes
in thinking or perspective. End result can be different from what one
visualizes when set out towards achieving it.
Two issues the director touches
upon though subtly. One, dwindling reserves of water and the Naxalite issue. Drought
was a concern in 1960s and is a concern in 2015 as well. We have failed to
provide this basic necessity to our people. Technology has improved healthcare and
education and overall standard of living but hasn’t been able to address
effective utilisation of our water resources. Unfortunately, companies providing
water facilities will not get high valuation on stock exchanges. Same applied
for the Naxalite issue. A concern in 1960s and in 2015 too. Capitalism has
failed to uplift the masses especially in far-flung areas of India. Naxalites
will not come into the mainstream unless they see an opportunity that this is
addressed.
There is a disclaimer at the
start of the movie which says that even thought the story is based on a real
event, some creative liberties have been taken. A snake biting Manjhi, and him
having to cut off his toe so that the poison doesn’t spread could be one of the
fictionalised account. The director must have wanted to show that in a
single-minded pursuit of a task, tough decisions should be taken. And if it
means physical pain, so be it.
The movie, I suppose, takes a
jibe at our democracy. When a make-shift stage during a political rally
crumbles under its weight, a few people rush and hold it aloft with their
shoulder. And the politician nonchalantly continues with her speech. A police
inspector releases Manjhi because people outside the police station shout
slogans for his release. And he is released under public pressure. I don’t mean
that Manjhi was a criminal and should not be released, it shows that our laws
have so many perforations, that arresting someone and releasing them is a
subjective issue than objective.
The movie end with the road being
built bearing Manjhi’s name. As the end credits roll, you feel sad that the
government could only help Manjhi by naming the road after him. Countless
un-named people are toiling in India and hope the government reaches them
before they give up.
dubai independent escorts
ReplyDeletecall girls in dubai
dubai escorts
escort doha
mumbai call girls